Musharraf – ‘The Dictator Dog’

I’m a bit clueless on this topic, BUT a certain acquaintance isn’t and I must applaud his stance on the current political situation. I’ve never read anything that made more sense in my life! I totally agree with the dude. Lovin’ it!!

By Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar:

”I find it difficult to believe that in this day and age, we still have educated people defending this dictator dog… especially after all that he has done to this country and its people.

  • This one man has destroyed the supreme court.
  • He “fired” 50+ judges of the higher courts when he has no authority to do so.
  • He SOLD Pakistani citizens for five thousand dollars. I would not sell my car for that kind of money. And this man who is supposed to be the symbol of the federation of Pakistan SOLD Pakistani citizens.
  • He even sold Pakistani women.
  • One’s heart bleeds when one sees what happened to Dr. Aafia Siddiqi. The poor lady was abducted WITH her kids. We still don’t know where her kids are.
  • He tortured journalists.
  • He has created a war zone in our North.
  • He was selling national assets BELOW their net asset values.
  • He had ordinary civilians beaten and tortured for protesting.
  • He tortured protesting lawyers.
  • Munir Malik nearly died because of kidney failure when he was arrested by Musharraf’s mafia.

The dictator has;

- no respect for the laws of the country,

- for the constitution of Pakistan,

- or the rights of the citizens of Pakistan,

- for the media of Pakistan which has rendered great service to the people of Pakistan as their watchdog.

And yet we say that others are worse? And so what if Zardari and Nawaz are worse? At least they are leaders of democratically elected political parties! yes, they have problems but we will get to them when we get rid of the bigger devil. At least there is a way to kick them out – which are elections. How do we get rid of dictators? They are absolutely shameless and won’t go even if you beg them. Today 85%+ of people want Musharraf to leave as per the IRI survey and yet this beghairat man won’t leave! The point isn’t even what crimes the dictator dog committed because he will get what is due to him one day. The problem is why are we still looking at personalities? Our solution will not come from individuals be it scum like Musharraf, Dogar or Altaf Hussain or heroes like the honorable CJ of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Chauhdry, Aitzaz Ahsan, etc or individual politicians like Zardari or Sharif, etc. We need systems and institutions. We need democracy – not one man rule. We have spent more than 30 years experimenting with one man rule. It does NOT work. Ayub laid the seeds for Bangladesh’s destruction. Yahya completed the deed. Zia laid the seeds for Talibanization and terrorism and Musharraf has completed the deed. Ayub and Yahya gave us the separation of Bangladesh. Zia and Musharraf may have done the same for Balochistan or NWFP (God forbid). The moral of the story is that the bloody army and its corrupt generals have to stay out of bloody politics. Their job is to defend the borders of the country – not rule over us bloody civilians like we were second class citizens in our own country. Everyone harps on about what the politicians have taken. Okay, but what have the generals stolen? Where are the accounts for that? “Look Musharraf doesnt have much powers any more, and wow just look at how amazing our country is doing! We are going down FAST, the new govt. is squeezing out what was left in our country.” So, you gave the dictator dog NINE YEARS to prove how incompetent he was. And yet you think this government is failing after FOUR MONTHS! how is this govt supposed to fix the mess that the dictator has created in NINE long and dark years in less than half a year? “And maybe that is exactly why Ali Azmat supports Musharraf. ” And what credibility does Mr. Azmat have? This is the same man who said that he voted for MQM despite the fact that Junoon was threatened by the terrorist Muttahida Qaatil Movement. It’s much easier to be a “rebel” with a guitar than to stand up for yourself in real life, eh Mr. Azmat? I always thought that artists deserved more respect in our society. but the key is who exactly is an artist… And this reminds me of something Fasi Zaka wrote. He said something to the effect that Pakistan might have many good singers but we don’t have artists and that there is a difference between the two. Ali Azmat might be a singer or a maraasi but he is certainly no artist. Artists historically are always the first to stand up to tyranny and dictatorship – not first to bow down their head to dictators and fascists like Mr. Azmat likes to. They act as the conscience of society. After watching Mr. Azmat’s verbal diarrhea, I have promised myself that I will never buy any of his albums again. I cannot support a man who supports fascist terrorists like Muttahida Qaatil Movement and dictators and tyrants like Musharraf. As offended as I was by Mr. Azmat talking out of his ass and by how he disrespected Pakistani people by saying that we don’t want to educate ourselves and we can only be kept in line with a danda and therefore, Musharraf is the solution… the thing that worries me is that I was a kid when VS came around. And I remember that Junaid, Rohail etc were more than musicians to me. I hung on their every word and treated them like heroes. But then, I grew up. and while I still like these guys, I don’t form my political views based on theirs. so, today there are kids who listen to and probably idolize Junoon and Mr. Amzat who latch on to every ill-thought word that Mr. Azmat utters who are going to be disillusioned with democracy and the political process. This worries me. We need our generation and younger people to become involved with the politics of their country – not become despondent and give up their country so that traitors like Musharraf run amok for decades. In the end, I’m sorry super for turning this into my soapbox. but I feel very strongly about this and I just cannot believe that this dictator who has brought our country to the brink of destruction is still being defended by the so-called intelligentsia of Pakistan!”

30 Responses to “Musharraf – ‘The Dictator Dog’”


  1. 1 Eddie August 8, 2008 at 4:01 am

    lol he is just a puppet…. a string in the strongly woven concpiracy cloth … there is a way bigger picture to take care of

  2. 2 Eddie August 8, 2008 at 4:04 am

    he’ll leave sure .. he will… and the next will come…. and the ranting goes on …

  3. 3 Ersalan August 8, 2008 at 5:08 am

    And its exactly potty mouthed people like the author that keep on ranting about the CJs and stuff that will hardly do anybody any good. The real problems that are faced by the masses will remain there, the rupee will fall further, flour and oil prices will continue to soar and everything will be blamed on the previous government.

    4 months and I have yet to see a positive step made by this government. If this is democracy then to hell with it!

  4. 4 Ersalan August 8, 2008 at 8:19 am

    oh man! Im aphauled at the short sightedness of the author

    no respect for – for the media of Pakistan which has rendered great service to the people of Pakistan as their watchdog.

    Who the heck do you think granted them the freedom of speech in the first place?

  5. 5 supersizeme August 8, 2008 at 9:28 am

    eddie; itnaa aahsaan kab ho ga? it does seem like it will drag on for years – decades maybe.

    ersalan;
    do you how the falling economy can be solved??

    by dislodging ourselves from america’s butt, where mushy firmly lodged us somewhere between those 9 years ago to now.
    America has hit recession, its economy is almost rock bottom, ONLY the countries closely tied to it are suffering, the rest of the world is fine and dandy. who are the affected countries may you ask? britain – because the brits have always been licky-licky with the yanks , because they get a free military.. they dont have to spend a penny on self-defence, they benefit from america’s alliance, apart from this one-off circumstance. the other country is pakistan. WHY has mush got himself so closely tied with these guys??
    i agree with eddie it’s all part of the ‘bigger picture, we dont know whether mush gave in willingly or not… but the fact remains we cant ignore all the crap the people have had to face since he came into power!
    the people have voted him out, enough is enough. fact, they’re so desperate to be rid of him they voted ZARDARI.. this qoum would never have wanted to this ”crook” in power.. the pivotal point couldn’t only have had been ‘pity’ after bibi’s assasination it’s most probable that they’ve had it up to their eyeballs with mush.

    about the media; he also had the very same journalists, he had given this ”free reign” to, beaten up and locked up! what the hell.. what sort of govt. does that?

  6. 6 SHan August 8, 2008 at 11:06 am

    Yaar all i can say is that “Nafrat ney app kee ankhoon per patiaa bandh dee hai”

    This was disgusting,,,,,, u only see some of this judges issue and is calling a man of Musharaf material a DOG, shame on u,,,, Do’nt u remeber the fact when ur so called elected politician looted the national treasures he was the man who helped the foreign reserves to rise to over Rs. 14 billion( the largest in country’s history),,, he was the man of firm believe who diminished the war threats with India even after 10 months of the largest troop stand-off at the border,,,, he was the one who brought foreign investment on billions in Pakistan, even brought China for Gawadar, he was the one who gave the concept of developing alternative energy resources like Thar Coal Reserve, when he was there we saw double fold returns in Stock markets, he gave us the local govt. set-up, I have never seen (nor even heard) karachi developing at such pace in decades, underpasses, overhead bridges, water supply and what do you want from him,,,, he brought this F-16 deal for u,, nuclear civil developing deal from china. abb agar Northern region mein seperatist hain joo zaban kee bat nahi suntey too kya karein uun kaa u suggest plz,,,, Even India, Sirilanka, China, Russia and many others r facing separtist movements and all of them r encoutring them with power,,, wid no LAWAYER type pplz voices,,, Ru ppl insane or what,,,,,,

    I don’t say the sacking the judges was the best of the things to be done,,,,,, that I count as his mistake,, which worsen wid time,,,,

    kher no use of explaining to radical forces like you,,, who don’t use there own brains for analysis rather r alway dependents on these somo intelectutal leaders who serve their own interest for most of the time

    Please don’t bother to response to this,, u don’t talk sense.

  7. 7 supersizeme August 8, 2008 at 11:18 am

    ooh.. ok.. no response for you then mister shan!

    i’m simply talking to myself when i say i’d rather see a ”thief after money and material goods” in power, than someone who has turned everything on its head and put so puts so many lives at stake.

  8. 8 MummyDaddy August 8, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    Links for the article you copy pasted by whatever Tarara Saheb.

    Give credit yaara :p.

  9. 9 supersizeme August 8, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    haha mummydaddy.. not to worry. he posted this as a comment, i decided it’s far too good to just be another random comment, it needed to get put out out there as a post!

    what’s your take on mushy though md?

  10. 10 Eddie August 9, 2008 at 7:17 am

    LOL ITS NOT only mushi that has been with US… its the whole pai govenerment right from the worrd go. The day quaid e azam died … it was all over..every ruler after that went to america .. like mushi. from ayub khan till musharaf..history is the proof of it… when we should ahve strong relations with russia and china … we always seek help from USA..who moulds our political stances like a clay doh…. media again si misusing their independence of speech they make opinions ..for their own benefits..they sell news rather than bringing them to u. they decide what to show and what not to show…its a dirty busines and they aredoing it …. overtaking the minds of most of the ppl …. i am not in support of media at all..nor msuharaf nor any “democratic government”…. we may need a dictator though coz yeh qaum hi danday ki hai including myself… period.. but the dictator has to be sincere with the nation … i wish hazrat Umar was in our time too ..we badly need one…

  11. 11 Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar August 9, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    this is why I hate getting into political debates… ’cause you inevitably end up wasting a lot of time… now the latest IRI survey says that 86% of Pakistanis want Musharraf gone. so, this blog seems to be lucky that it is blessed with readers that belong to the 14% minority. yay for the 14 percent moderately enlightened (only moderately enlightened but heaven forbid we don’t wanna get too enlightened) types…

    “oh man! Im aphauled at the short sightedness of the author

    Who the heck do you think granted them the freedom of speech in the first place?”

    no need to be “aphauled” chanda…

    first of all, I completely disagree that the dictator dog gave them the freedom of speech. does PEMRA ring a bell? does anyone recall the completely arbitrary rules that this body made up on the fly? towards the end, the rules were that if anyone criticized the president, the prime minister or any part of the govt, that was grounds for the show to be shut down. Musharraf targeted INDIVIDUAL journalists. it doesn’t get any more pathetic and petty than that. Hamid Mir, etc, got death threats. they were running around scared for their lives. shows were taken off air without warning if they said anything that could remotely offend the self-proclaimed king and zill-e-elahi of Pakistan. one time Talat’s program was taken off air simply because Nusrat Javed was a guest on it when his own program was banned. he didn’t even say anything against the dictator. his only crime was showing his face on TV in Talat’s show. doesn’t sound like freedom of speech to me.

    either way, lets say that the dog did give the media its freedom of speech. so, if someone “gives” others the freedom of speech, then does that give that person the right to take it away? if one does that, why and what do they still get credit for? sounds to me like a threat… “okay, I’m going to give you bit of a leash… but if you dare say anything that is critical of me… then I’m going to yank that leash hard”… that is not freedom of speech. if the dictator didn’t take shows and entire channels off air, banned individual journalists, set up black individual-centric laws then maybe he could get credit for it. but after everything he did, to still say that the dictator “deserves” credit for giving the media its “freedom” is illogical and nonsensical.

    I remember watching a show with representatives of the journalist community who said that Musharraf’s rule was the worst time for press freedom they had seen. this was the day after journalists were beaten black and blue in Islamabad by Musharraf’s mafia. this assessment was shared by a journalist who was flogged by Zia’s brutal regime. he described in detail how he was whipped in public by the cursed dictator’s henchmen and how it affected his health for the rest of his life. even he said that Musharraf’s era was worse for press freedom than any other era before. so much for “freedom of speech” eh.

    the only thing the dictator can claim credit for is giving licenses to private channels. even there I would argue that this was inevitable. do you seriously think that private media organizations were going to be stopped in today’s world where US presidential debates are watched on youtube and presidential candidates make it a point to address and target online audiences? private media was a flood that was on its way simply because of economics. India has tons of private channels. Pakistan was always going to gets it own set. it was just a matter of time and private media would have come regardless of whose government it was. it was just time. the opportunity was there. whenever there is an opportunity, entrepreneurs and capital flow to that area.

  12. 12 Extiinct August 9, 2008 at 3:19 pm

    exactly why i stay away from political posts. But I just can’t help butting in.

    We’re doing what everyone before us has been doing; Playing the blame game.

    Instead of telling people what the previous government did wrong, how about talking about ways the present government can remedy the situation they deem so dire.

    As for the media and the judiciary, short term memory loss is a curse. Have we forgotten the days of PTV before musharraf came and private channels sprouted up left, right and centre? Give the man credit where it’s due. He didn’t do everything wrong in his regime.

    As for the judiciary, do we know anyone who says that they got a fair trial ever? That their case got resolved without giving rishwat to anyone? Will getting the judiciary control inflation?

    Will we get fair trials after the judiciary is back?

  13. 13 Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar August 9, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    Extiinct,

    1) yes, the PTV days were bad and PTV is still a joke today. but I feel like I said up there that the only thing the dictator deserves credit for is giving licenses to private channels. and that was purely an economic phenomenon. I would argue it was just a matter of time before private channels popped up regardless of whose government it was. the Indian private channels were making merry. you don’t think Pakistani entrepreneurs would want a part of the action? either way, for the sake of argument I will concede and give credit to the dictator for allowing private channels.

    but how do you “give” freedom to the press and then take it away? what kind of giving is that? that is not giving. that is a carrot and stick policy. when the dictator’s opponents were bashed on channels run by his pal Salman Taseer, everything was great. there is a reason why Salman Taseer’s channels were either not taken off air and if they were, they came back before others. long live the free press, etc. but as soon as someone dared criticize the dictator. “this press is out of control. and it needs to be muzzled”. am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy there? that is not press freedom. this is the “if you criticize my opponents, you’re free but as soon as you talk about me, I’m going to yank your tongue out” policy.

    2) lets assume for a second that the judicial system is corrupt, does that mean you “fire” the whole supreme court? also, did the dictator “fire” the judges and arrest them with their families because they were supposedly corrupt or did he “fire” and imprison them because they would not sell out to him and give him a favorable verdict? lets be honest here…

    besides in what part of the world do they arrest (illegally btw) and imprison judges with their families? where in the world does an army chief have the authority to “fire” supreme court judges? please remember the president didn’t fire the judges – the army chief did. such pathetic dramas don’t even taken place in the most banana republic of banana republics. and this happened in a nation of 160 million people.

    regarding corruption, I also feel that the army and its generals are corrupt. they are mercenaries who sell out to the highest bidder which is generally the US. they will do anyone’s bidding even if it hurts the interests of the Pakistani people. so, now can we please fire all the generals and the colones and bring in new ones? after all they are “all” corrupt just like “all” the judges are corrupt. I would like to order a new army please – one that is Pakistan’s army and not the chief’s army.

  14. 14 Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar August 9, 2008 at 5:17 pm

    SHan:

    even though you asked me not respond to your drivel and I don’t think it merits a response either but there are so many juvenile things in there that you force my hand…

    “This was disgusting,,,,,, u only see some of this judges issue and is calling a man of Musharaf material a DOG, shame on u,,,,”

    shame on me? shame on anyone who defends the dictator dog after everything he/it has done to this country. the case of Dr. Aafia Siddiqi (more details here http://www.teeth.com.pk/blog/2008/08/09/dr-afias-health-serious-bullet-wound-kidney-removed-battered-nose-children-missing#more-2407) should be enough for the indictment of the dictator but this is just one of the numerous achievements of the dictator dog.

    and btw, calling a dictator a dog is not something I invented. dictators have been called dogs since Ayub’s time. the only difference between now and then is that Ayub had the shame to leave when the people called him a dog because he knew that the people hated him but the current dictator is too beghairat to be affected by that or by the fact that the overwhelming majority of Pakistanis hates him and wants him gone.

    “Do’nt u remeber the fact when ur so called elected politician looted the national treasures he was the man who helped the foreign reserves to rise to over Rs. 14 billion( the largest in country’s history),,,”

    you’re telling me in that the dictator’s time there was no looting? the dictator is renowned to be at least a millionaire. the US keeps asking about the aid that it’s given because too much of it has gone unaccounted. so again it must be the dictator’s underlings who’ve stolen because our dear old dictator has descended straight from heaven. is that why he didn’t declare his assets when he ran for elections the second time even though he did do so the first time?

    if the dictator is such an angel then why was the steel mill being sold for less than the net assets it had? it was cash flow positive. such assets are always sold at a premium derived by applying a multiple to the cash flow and the multiple depends on the quality of the cash flow. only insolvent assets are sold for under net assets so that they can be liquidated. what kind of daylight robbery was this? as someone who has an interest in investing, I dream of getting such bargains in the stock market because they are either extremely rare or don’t exist. (if you can find them, LOAD up like there’s no tomorrow.) so, why was the dictator giving away a national asset to his pals? and wasn’t that the main fault of the CJ – that he was stopping the dictator from gifting a national asset to his pals – for which he was punished so harshly? that and the case of pursuing the fate of the missing people that the dictator’s agencies had picked up and sold to other nations.

    also, what’s with blindly parroting the economic stats? why do you think the foreign reserves are so important? our foreign reserves always go up under dictatorships because the US supports the dictator’s regime. have you ever looked at the inflation rate was under Mush’s regime. inflation in enemy number of any central bank and the thing that keeps central bankers like Benanke up at night. go look at the inflation rate under uncle dictator and it will put the growth rate in perspective.

    “he was the man of firm believe who diminished the war threats with India even after 10 months of the largest troop stand-off at the border,,,,”

    OMG! now you’re just making stuff up. have you forgotten what happened in Kargil? that was the dictator dog’s pet project. many experts believe that the Kargil misadventure was started without the knowledge of the PM by the army chief of the time. so, you’re telling me that the man responsible for the ignominy of Kargil is somehow an ambassador of peace? my God. I can understand you wanting to defend Musharraf… actually I don’t. but at least don’t make up stuff.

    “he was the one who brought foreign investment on billions in Pakistan”

    like I said before, dictators are always richly rewarded when they ball with the US.

    “I have never seen (nor even heard) karachi developing at such pace in decades, underpasses, overhead bridges, water supply and what do you want from him,,,,”

    I also remember an underpass collapsing because of piss poor construction in Karachi killing people… I also remember 50 people being killed by the dictator’s terrorist allies – Muttahida Qaatil Movement – on the 12th of May in Karachi when the dictator declared that this was a “show of power” and expressed his satisfaction on the events of the day. just remarkable! either way if the Muttahia Qaatil Movement have done good things for the city of Karachi that is fantastic. that reminds me – Uncle Altaf Terrorist Hussain told Karachi youth to get arms for “self defence”. have you gotten your yet?

    “he brought this F-16 deal for u,”

    wtf am I gonna do with these F-16s when I don’t have food to eat or a hospital to go to? can I take these F16s apart and eat them? what a fking retarded thought process our armed forces have? in a country where people go to sleep with no food in their stomachs all these generals want is more weapons so they can start more wars which they always lose. beghairat idiots!

    “abb agar Northern region mein seperatist hain joo zaban kee bat nahi suntey too kya karein uun kaa u suggest plz,,,,”

    these separatists of today aka Taliban were created by Zia and his army 20 years ago. and in his time, Mushy has cultivated and farmed them. and now the crop has ripe for the cutting. the problem again is military dictatorship and the army no matter which way you spin it.

    “who don’t use there own brains for analysis rather r alway dependents on these somo intelectutal leaders who serve their own interest for most of the time”

    what kind of absurdity is that? I guess if one doesn’t have the ability to think for themselves, then instead of blind sloganeering, it’s best to listen to an intellectual and adopt his views because hopefully he/she will have spent some time thinking about the subject and formed an intelligent opinion. no intellectual worth his salt would ever argue for a military dictatorship over democracy.

    “u don’t talk sense.”

    the feeling is very much mutual.

  15. 15 Nen August 9, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    I would prefer a cruel dictator over the black comedians any day. They are indecisive, ostentatious and ridiculous. They talk a lot and talk in cliches. It would’ve been equally tiresome watching them even if they were horribly patriotic.

    A dozen babies could’ve been conceived in as many sessions as Zardari and Nawaz had in all sorts of places.

  16. 16 Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar August 9, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    “The day quaid e azam died … it was all over.”

    sorry.. but that is retarded. if it was all over. why didn’t you just kill yourself as soon as the above realization dawned upon you ’cause that would seem the most logical course of action?

    lets not deal in only cliches. yes, the Quaid was great but he is one man and he is gone. life goes on. great people die and yet the world goes on. it is never over after the loss of one man or even many men – no matter how great. great men change things but in the long term you always need systems and institutions – not individual saviors.

    “media again si misusing their independence of speech they make opinions ..for their own benefits..they sell news rather than bringing them to u. they decide what to show and what not to show…its a dirty busines and they aredoing it …. overtaking the minds of most of the ppl …. i am not in support of media at all..”

    media certainly has a responsibility but freedom is freedom. you can’t give them only freedom to praise but not freedom to criticize. btw, if you read any paper press you would know that much harsher things are said there. the only difference is that not everyone reads but almost everyone watches TV. so when the same thoughts are shown on TV, some pseudo-liberal wannabes get up in arms.

    yes, the media should be “neutral”. but the reason neutral media works in the US and in the UK because the govts there behave by a certain code of conduct. in Pakistan where the govt often exceeeds its limits, it is more important for the media to be fair and speak the truth than be superficially “neutral”. would you ask the media to be neutral if someone was murdered? do you want them to protect the accused and give his viewpoint prominence? I hope the answer is no. you simply cannot report a crime neutrally.

    in some things, there is only one way to look at it – and neutrality does not apply. when the honorable Chief Justice of Pakistan CJ Iftikhar Chauhdry (a great man) is dragged by his hair by policemen/agency men, the press SHOULD make a ruckus and neutrality does NOT apply. when the dictator has journalists beaten black and blue, neutrality does NOT apply. when the dictator “fires” 50 judges, neutrality does NOT apply. when lawyers are tortured, neutrality does NOT apply. when the dictator imposes a second martial law, neutrality does NOT apply. when the army chief takes over and destroys the laws of the country, neutrality does NOT apply. when so-called political parties like Muttahida Qaatil Movement engage in terrorism, neutrality does NOT apply. when the army interferes in civilian affairs, neutrality does NOT apply. when innocent civilians are picked up, made to disappear and sent to other countries without ever being charged, neutrality does NOT apply.

    it is more important to speak the truth, call a spade a spade and even take sides then to simply report “neutrally”. go check out influential newspapers and the press is in the US. the press is the public’s watchdog. the only thing Pakistani press can be accused of doing is doing its job too well for that is its only crime.

    “we may need a dictator though coz yeh qaum hi danday ki hai including myself… period..”

    now that is very, very offensive. please feel free to sign your life away to the whims and fancies of a dictator. I am quite capable of making my own decisions and I demand the right to choose for myself. you are free to refrain from voting which I suspect you did anyway. but you have no right to ask for dictatorships and subjugate my right to choose my government representatives.

    this is why I strongly feel that applying article 6 to the dictator isn’t good enough. it needs to be extended to the armymen, the judges, the lawyers, the journalists, the “intellectuals” who justify military dictatorships.

    “i wish hazrat Umar was in our time too”

    yeah, I also wish that I was some 25 years older and married to Shehnaz Sheikh and that she was in love with me but I don’t think it’s gonna work out for me and Shanno.

    so, good luck with waiting for Hazrat Umar. lemme know how its works out. in the meanwhile, I will be living in the real word in real time.

  17. 17 Eddie August 9, 2008 at 8:49 pm

    well i resent musharaf as any of the 86% mentioned…but in my opinion he is not the only culprit…. thats it… ppp is the biggest corruption party in that regard….. bilawal is currently in china and the chinese government has given him the protocol of a head of the state… its more like a monarchy than a democracy…. or so it seems ….

  18. 18 supersizeme August 10, 2008 at 12:24 am

    i still firmly stand by tarara’s views. i was on those same tracks but then started dithering when things became less clear. i’m glad i’ve snapped back into focus.
    i hate how mush has undermined his people. it’s disgraceful, and cases like dr aafia siddiqui’s just rile me, she is one of the countless casualties/victims of america’s and mushy’s joint war OF terror.

    glad SOMEONE out there can see the real picture clearly, whereas the rest of us don’t have a clue what we want.

  19. 19 عمار - aMmAr August 10, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    Goood Post Supe,

    Never mind idiots who still support the bastard who sold sisters and daughters for some dollars. Musharraf should be tried for his crimes against this country and countrymen.

    He should be hanged till death if you ask me, the crimes he committed sets new boundaries. You are honest and not short sighted like a very few minority.

  20. 20 supersizeme August 12, 2008 at 10:07 am

    cheers ammar, exactly, he deserves what he’s got coming, once he’s impeached let’s see how his jaan-e-wafa amreeka supports him (remember how they abandoned zia – then had him assassinated?)

    besides credit doesn’t go to me, it’s mutazalzalazzalalzzalaman tarar’s post,(phew)!

  21. 21 BigBan August 15, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    Oh, Thanks! Really interesting. Greets.

  22. 23 Nen August 16, 2008 at 7:46 pm

    The ghost swallowed my comment. It may appear later.

  23. 24 supersizeme August 16, 2008 at 10:31 pm

    it was in the spam queue.. for some odd reason..

    dont like fatima bhutto.. she’s a toffeenosed spiteful person only seeing life through tunnel-vision and selfish! there i said it!

  24. 25 Nen August 17, 2008 at 4:02 am

    Is there anyone anywhere who says sane things but somehow you still like him? Apart from me ofcourse.

  25. 26 Eddie August 18, 2008 at 9:59 am

    now that he is gone … SHIT!!! who are we going to blame now for our shortcomings.. SHIT SHIT SHIT :P

  26. 27 supersizeme August 18, 2008 at 11:16 am

    nen.. seriously dude.. is SHE sane? she’s loopy, nay she’s a witch!

    EDDIEEEE… Paaaarttttaaayyyy!!

  27. 28 Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar August 18, 2008 at 11:35 am

    good riddance.

    now put the traitor on trial and hang the treacherous dog… no “safe exit” please…

  28. 29 supersizeme August 18, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    yeah but if he’s hung, they ought to hang his allies too, the US govt .. like THAT’a gunna happen?!
    i think the fact he’s gone, he’s gone, let him just run and hide. InshAllah.. things will change!


  1. 1 Musharraf - ‘The Dictator Dog’ | Tea Break Trackback on August 8, 2008 at 1:21 am

Leave a Reply




Note: PLEASE EXCUSE THE GAY SMILIES!